LINK to share: https://hanglberger-manfred.de/en-god-and-nature.htm

 

HOME

 

 

God and Nature

 

Nature: beautiful and cruel

Whether we consider the effects of the Covid 19 pandemic or watch a video about the animals in an African national park: It is always frightening how cruel nature can show itself to us. On the one hand, we experience nature beautifully and fascinatingly, and also a mental balance and strengthening during a walk through a beautiful landscape. On the other hand, the forces of nature show their life-destroying effect, e.g. in floods, earthquakes and volcanic eruptions.

 

The forces of nature: tools in God's hand?

For thousands of years, people in the various religions believed that all natural events were controlled by God (or gods). Suffering from natural forces was always considered by these people as if God was punishing or testing them. Thus, the forces of nature were understood as tools in the hand of God to punish or educate mankind.

Even in our time, many people still think this way when they ask, in the face of a painful blow of fate, why God did this to them.

 

"Dark" image of God

When nature was experienced as cruel, God appeared to be cruel. Since the forces of nature in their destructive effect do not differentiate between people and inanimate material, between children and adults, between violent and helpful people, one spoke of the unpredictability of God. The spiritual blindness of the forces of nature, which were regarded as divine action, shaped an image of God that appeared "dark," "incomprehensible," and "arbitrary".

 

The “authority of Godwas the model for authority among men

If God appeared insensitive and cruel being the ruler of nature, but at the same time was understood as the supreme authority, then it was logical that people who had a role of authority in the family or in church or society were convinced that they have the right, even the obligation as believers to be cruel in their educational actions, in their punitive behavior and their other decisions in order to enforcelaw and order”. Violent educational practices were therefore religiously founded and customary in the area of the church. This was reinforced by some Bible statements ("He who loves his son, chastises him." Cf. Sir 30:1; Sir 30:13; Heb 12:6; ...) and by the religious idea that in the defiant phase of a child traces of the original sin are shown and that this must be cast out by beatings.

 

A healing and liberating theology has not prevailed

Already about 750 years ago, the great theologian Thomas Aquinas, through his study of the Bible and the writings of the Greek philosopher Aristotle, recognized that nature is set in a certain autonomy by the laws of nature.

In relation to nature, the Church took up Thomas Aquinas’ insight in the 13th century when she spoke of the "proper autonomy of earthly realities" in the Second Vatican Council (In Gaudium et Spes, ch 36).

 

The created things and also the societies have their own laws and values, which the human being has to recognize, use and shape step by step.
This corresponds to the will of the Creator.

Through their creation, all individual realities have their own fixed status,
their own truth, their own goodness as well as their own legality
and their own order, which the human being has to respect. (GS, chapter 36)


Neither in the Middle Ages nor in the centuries thereafter, this understanding was realized in the prayer culture of the Church and in its annunciation. But even after the Second Vatican Council (1962-1965), this conception of the autonomy of the forces of nature had no effect on the liturgy and on people's understanding of faith.
We continue to pray to the “almightyGod who lives and “rules”, although this is completely misunderstood by the believers: Does God rule the world or does he animate it? That is why the power of God and his work in nature would have to be expressed in other words and prayers.
So, in the practical life of the Church, we have an understanding of God's activity in the world that can mislead believers and thus destroy the faith.

 

A necessary doctrine of faith is still missing

Each era would have the task of relating the respective knowledge of nature to faith in a contemporary manner, that is, to formulate a meaningful understanding of God's activity in nature. In the relationship between faith on the one hand and politics, society and economy on the other hand, this has been done for more than a hundred years by the "Catholic Social Doctrine", which is constantly evolving due to social changes.

Equally necessary would be a doctrine of faith formulated in dialogue with the findings of the natural sciences and developed further in line with their progress in knowledge.

The fact that such a doctrine of faith is not formulated and thus no contemporary understanding of God's activity in nature is offered to the faithful is one of the greatest deficiencies of the Church, for which the Church’s leadership bears responsibility. Instead, the misleading prayers of the "almighty God" are imposed on the faithful.

 

Secularizationas liberation from religiously based violent authorities

When prayers, preaching and doctrine of the faith contradict the scientific knowledge of believers, the faith of many is destroyed.
Although "secularization" proclaims a one-sided - only scientific - view of the world and of man, it is experienced by many as liberation from fear-mongering, intimidation and paternalism by a constantly testing and punishing God and his earthly representatives, the bishops and priests. When those in charge of the Church abuse the authority of God and thus their own authority for inappropriate rulership, they are replaced by other authorities, e.g. by some politicians who stand up for human dignity and human rights and therefore allow their own power to be controlled, or by pedagogues who educate children and young people to spiritual maturity and responsibility, or by psychologists who help people to understand their scare tactics and learn to protect themselves from them.

 

A meaningful life needs the polarity of rationality and healthy spirituality

Even if "secularization" means liberation and progress for many people, as a purely rational view of the world and people, it leads in the long term to more and more egoism and meaninglessness for many people. For most of them it does not lead to a rationality of the common welfare, which would possibly also require renunciation and consideration, but only to the "rationality" of their own short-term interests. Therefore, a meaningful life needs the polarity between personal and community responsibility, the polarity between a rational view of the world and people as well as a spiritual connection with the world and people. But for such a spirituality an adequate understanding of God's work in the world is required, an adequate understanding of the inherent dynamics of nature, which is not misused by God as a tool for chastising and educating man. For such a spirituality, however, there is also a need for prayers that express an appropriate understanding of God's work in the world and in human beings.

 

 

Hanglberger Manfred (www.hanglberger-manfred.de )

 

Translated by: Ingeborg Schmutte

 

LINK to share: https://hanglberger-manfred.de/en-god-and-nature.htm

 



Other texts in English >>>

Index of the texts about Eucharist >>>

 

A contemporary Christian culture of prayer >>> (In German)

Understand and solve the problem of “secularization”: >>>

 

HOME